The theory of Dark Matter Has Been Challenged By This Scientists

https://img.inleo.io/DQmRR2fTAfSxWFkgHwrQaKJPnGuiJGLFvNkfnM6ifXd7JBC/cosmos-7868601_1280.webp

source

I have been following the dark matter debate for years now because when I first learned about it and they said it could represent more than 80 percent of the entire universe, I wanted to find out more about it.

I'm not a physicist or anything, but if you’ve spent enough time reading about it, you’ll realize the theory about it has some unsweetened questions and why wouldn't it? It's not the like the scientists are sure of what they're saying that's why they still call it a theory.

Dr. Richard Lieu has a new theory that gravity might not need mass to exist. This is basically saying that Gravity could be there before the first matter.

Lieu’s work and theory is trying to explain some of the confusion regarding the universe and with dark matter. For nearly a century, we've seen many scientists coming up with different theories and doing their best to explain the weird gravitational behaviors we see in space and dark matter. The problem here is that no one has actually seen this stuff.

Lieu with his new theory is basically saying that maybe we don't need to see it in the way we do. Instead of seeing dark matter as invisible matter we can see them as some shell-like structures that might be bending light and pulling galaxies together.

If his theory proves right, it'll be a huge shift in our understanding of the entire universe. It's very hard to understand this concept myself so if you the reader gets confused, don't feel bad we're basically in the same boat here.

His theory relies on topological defects and this is something I’ve barely heard of let alone seen so that I can call it evidence.

Lieu’s math is apparently solid because if it wasn't, scientists would have discounted it long ago but what if this is just another intellectual exercise? Maybe these shells exist, maybe they don’t. Until I see them or find concrete evidence, it’s just another theory for me which I don't buy.

I give him respect for being smart enough to challenge the theory of dark matter. In the end it could even be that we’ve been overcomplicating things this whole time. Because of how fast technology is advancing especially with AI and Quantum computers, I have hope that we'll find better answers in the next decade.

Posted Using InLeo Alpha