Web 3.0 Impact Upon Freedom Of Speech

There is an interesting evolution taking place, pushed by Elon Musk and Twitter.

Since he took over the social media platform, information was released concerning the behind the scenes activities that led to banning and censorship. Musk came in promising free speech but we know that is impossible.

Twitter is a centralized platform and people do not want free speech. Sure, they claim they do yet the second something appears that they disagree with, they want it gone. Whether it is called fake news, conspiracy theories, or hate speech, someone wants it removed.

When it comes to centralized systems, governments have a great deal of power. This means that those entities operating under those jurisdictions have to play by those rules. There is really no way around it.

In the end, Musk can proclaim free speech all he wants. If there is something that someone with power wants gone, he will ultimately have to oblige.

Perhaps he is trying to get ahead of the curve with this.

twitter.png
Source

Labeling of Tweets

It was announced that Twitter will now be labeling tweets. The claim is to help the safety of the network by placing labels on tweets that violate the terms of service. This is done to ensure that these remain low ranked and do not receive visibility. It also is a step to offer more transparency.

When I hear labeling, I cannot help but to think this is going to be something that is to feed the Elon Musk machine learning engine. Twitter is a treasure chest of data and he acquired a great deal of it. His interest in artificial intelligence is well documented. Labeling is a way to accelerate the machine learning. Nevertheless, that will be the topic of an upcoming article.

The challenge for Twitter is that it has a terms of service. Again, it has to adhere to standards set down for them. It does not allow for the company to allow any content.

After all, Twitter could be ordered to take information down. More importantly, the company has the ability to do so. Therefore, regardless of what is posted, it only remains at the discretion of Twitter. While Musk might have changed the practices from the previous regime, he still retains the ability to wipe out accounts.

Trying to make information ranked low so as to reduce visibility is much different than removing the information altogether.

Censorship Resistant

We often talk about Web 3.0, and Hive specifically, as being censorship resistant. This was the entire premise behind blockchain. The introduction of Bitcoin brought us the idea of monetary transactions that could not be altered or reversed. Nor could they be prohibited.

This concept has extended out, especially on Hive that can store text data. That means whatever is placed on-chain is basically immutable and censorship resistant. We can see how this differs from what is on Twitter. No matter what front ends do with the data, it is still there for everyone to read on a block explorer such as Hiveblocks.

Recent announcements regarding the SpkNetwork show how this is being expanded. That system is being designed to extend this premise to photos, audio, and video. We are going to be offered this option regardless of the media format.

Here is where we decentralized (or distributed) computing applied. This is the formation of decentralized cloud. Again, most of what we post on the Internet is at the peril of either the application (platform) of the hosting company. Not only will the front end have their own terms of service, so does an entity such as Amazon.

We begin to see how controlled the Internet truly is.

Web 3.0

The foundation of Web 3.0 mirrors what Satoshi Nakamoto brought forth in the Bitcoin white paper. From there, we saw the idea of a system constructed that was outside the reach of the established players. The focus there was payments. However, with the expansion of data that can be stored, we can see how we are repeating the process.

Satoshi was mostly focused upon the banks. The goal was to create a monetary system they did not control. Bitcoin introduced the decentralized ledger that was open to anyone while solving the double spend problem.

Hive could be framed in the same light. Instead of the banks, although there is that aspect to the [ecosystem](https://leofinance.io/@leoglossary/leoglossary-ecosystem-digital0, it sought to provide a forum outside the reach of AWS. It decentralized text storage.

Fortunately, the last few years were spent focusing upon the scaling capabilities of the network. Now we see other sidechain projects that seek to take this to another level.

Decentralized cloud brings an entirely new model to the table. What happens when the exclusivity of the silos is broken? How do things change when anyone can post an article, video, or podcast without fear of removal?

This is obviously a major step beyond what Musk is doing. He is still playing around in the Web 2.0 realm. For him, there is no interest in Web 3.0. In fact, he will likely make tens of billions more in that arena.

Web 3.0 is slow to emerge because it is being built from the ground up. This is an entirely different way of housing data. Does that mean everything will convert to this? Not at all. There is a lot of data that belongs on centralized databases.

However, what we are seeing is the opportunity to decentralize that which is required. This means that freedom of speech, censorship, and political games are altered completely.

Today, the separation of money and "speech" is eliminated. After all, it is really nothing more than data.

And that is what Satoshi introduced more than a decade ago. The entire foundation of Bitcoin was regarding who controlled the data.

Technology is just taking this further out.


If you found this article informative, please give an upvote and rehive.

gif by @doze

screen_vision2025_1.png

logo by @st8z

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta



0
0
0.000
19 comments
avatar

For the "safety of the network". Labeling speech as dangerous alone is already a huge step towards censorship.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Twitter is a Web 2 and will remain as such, it will and does not have the intention to be Web 3, labeling tweets is proof that censorship still exists on Twitter even after its acquisition by Musk.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

HIVE is still missing Twitter like curation option. Is anyone able to take Twitter’s codes (now open source) and use it for HIVE or LeoThreads?

0
0
0.000
avatar

Hi TM, looks like you missed a link with "ecosystem".

One thing I'm struggling to get my head around with Web3 is accuracy of facts.

Obviously a platform that is censorship-resistance is good (especially if large corporations or governments are operating secretly and unjustly) and obviously a platform that does not care about being advertiser-friendly is good as well. Not everyone enjoys content that is only deemed advertiser-friendly.

When it comes to accuracy of facts though, how do we know anything posted on Web3 is accurate? How can we know anything stated on a Web3 platform is just not completely made up?

0
0
0.000
avatar

How can we know that anywhere? If I search a controversial topic right now on Google, there are good chances that I will find a bunch of “fact checkers” in the first 10 results, then a bunch of stories about the story, followed by - never finding the actual facts. I don’t know, I mean, honestly I’ve been struggling with this question IRL for a few years now. How can I trust anything? Some say if it’s approved by the government it can be trusted, some say that’s exactly when it can NOT be trusted. Even a book, even if written in the 1600’s or something, is still just words written by the hands of men.

So it may not be any more factual than what can be found elsewhere, but when it’s censorship resistant, we can get an honest look at sentiment. How are people feeling about things, etc.

How is it, for example, that there is no cell phone footage from the Boston Marathon bombing? If there’s an odd-shaped turd on the sidewalk, it’s gonna get posted, but years after this event, all the footage to be consumed has been provided to us by corporate media. Like really? So bloggers, I agree, could not have given us guaranteed facts on this story, but mountains of personal photos could probably add to the details up for review. Not going tin-foil hat here, this was just the first example that came to mind.

Checked out your profile - thought there’d be more ninja training than there was. You still doing that? Seems pretty cool :)

0
0
0.000
avatar

Hey!

Yeah, I'm training every day but I've had an issue with my elbow for 2 years now so I've really just been doing boring rehab stuff instead of interesting obstacle stuff.

It's a good point... maybe it comes down to reputation instead. For example, I now trust that Coffeezilla is mostly trustworthy because he's shown that he really researches things deeply and provides evidence where he can. Of course, he's not going to be perfect, and he might get tricked by something, but generally I trust him, especially since he doesn't take brand deals and is funded by his Patreons.

I'm not 100%, but I think the BBC in the UK has a good reputation for following journalistic standards and not reporting on something until they have a number of confirmed reliable sources.

I think you're right though, Web3 is good to aggregate the general sentiment of a story and the collection of evidence. I guess there is always the danger of people being like Reddit, Tik Tok or Twitter detectives and pouncing on theories before they are confirmed... if I remember correctly Twitter was sure they knew the Boston Marathon Bomber but the person they thought it was had actually committed suicide days before - a good example of the crowd treating theory as fact.

0
0
0.000
avatar

LOL! Yeah, crowds treating rumors as facts is definitely a thing :)

I’m sorry to hear about your elbow my dude, that is not at all what I expected to hear. I never did a formal ninja thing or whatever, it I used to live in the country and kind of made my own warrior course…well, I was in the process of making it. Now I live in the suburbs and just exercise on a tonal. It’s great, and actually I’m impressed with how effective it is, but I miss the action of climbing to the top of a tree, shooting a recurve and swinging on a rope across the open path.

In general, that kind of activity excites so much more than just our muscles, it’s our sense of adventure!

Anyway my dude, I apologize for maybe bringing up some old shit…but I feel for you. You seem like a legitimately cool person, and I hope you recover and get back out there!

0
0
0.000
avatar

I've heard the Tonal is amazing! I'm glad it's working for you.

Your course was awesome! I definitely agree about the adventure of it too... but I think it's more than that... I think when you're doing courses and ropes and hanging and rappelling you're training your body to be useful. If (and I absolutely hope not) you were ever in an emergency like a natural disaster, you'd have the body awareness, flexibility and muscularity to get yourself to safety. There's not many disasters you can bicep curl your way out of.

Thank you! I'm honestly doing okay. It's taken longer than 2 years, but with my elbow (still not 100%) I can do 6 sets of 6 pull ups - I've had to be careful and slow but I'm getting there. I just have to be careful about certain angles, etc. I was literally just playing with laches (swinging from one bar and throwing yourself onto another bar) earlier today and got two in before feeling any pain, which is a huge improvement from a few months ago.

I'm excited to follow you on Hive and see what else you get up to!

0
0
0.000
avatar

Dude, you just hit the nail on the head! That is exactly what plays in my mind whenever I exercise - I’m training my body to be capable in case the world ever gets…less comfortable.

Six sets of six pull-ups …that’s legit! I used to consider myself pretty pull-up strong when I could do 2 sets of 10 but I don’t know if I ever had 6 6’s in me. Now I want to try to work up to that! Likewise my friend, I’m looking forward to seeing more of you around here. Happy Wednesday!

0
0
0.000
avatar

I will look at it. Thanks.

As for the question, it is where trust comes in. What is the reputation of the source.

We know the mainstream media is showing itself to be garbage and propaganda/agenda. Same with much of social media.

So are we really any worse off?

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

You may be interested in "my version" of the coming U.S. Monetary Correction...

0
0
0.000
avatar

Labeling tweets seem like saying this is what I want to see or don't see in my platform. So Twitter users can know what to expect and posts that are encouraged. Web3 is definitely a better alternative to these web2 platforms.

0
0
0.000
avatar

As my girlfriend would say: those who have money do what they want, Elon will do what he considers best with his domains, if it didn't benefit us, people would stop using it and be forgotten.

0
0
0.000
avatar

It's clear that the rise of Web 3.0 is a big change in how we store data, and it has the potential to completely change how free speech, censorship, and political games work. Even though Twitter and Facebook are still the most popular Web 2.0 platforms, it's good to see that Web 3.0 platforms are starting to pop up that are truly decentralized and can't be censored. Thank you for sharing your knowledge about this important subject.

0
0
0.000
avatar

No matter what Elon does, there will always be some bias towards things and I think most platforms tends to do some form of moderation once it's big enough. Either way, it's better than what it was before so it's a step forward but I think crypto would be more free.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Excellent perspective as always. I never believed Elon for a second when he claimed to be bringing free speech to Twitter. Twitter will always be the problem, rather than ever being part of the solution.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000