Britain's Broken Energy Policies...?
British Energy companies are owed £3.2 in bad debt. That's debt from consumers who probably won't ever be able to pay back the money they owe.
These consumers will mostly come from the bottom 10% of households by income, and be considerably more likely to be on benefits. These are the people who face the daily choice, in the winter months, between eating or heating.
We see plenty of these people in Citizens Advice every week, people in debt because their incomes (be that from benefits or work) haven't kept up with the increasing cost of living. In many cases their situation isn't helped by living in poor quality, badly insulated housing which increases the cost of bills.
The government's solution...
The government's solution to this bad debt is, via OFGEM, to allow energy companies to add a one off additional £16 charge to household bills from April 2024/ 25 to allow companies to recover this bad debt.
This is kind of like everyone paying a specific energy tax to cover the costs of the poorest sectors of society. As far as I can tell this includes the poorest households too, even though presumably most of them won't be any better off than they were last year.
All of this while energy firms have made almost £2 billion in profits over the past year.
And these profits benefit those wealthy enough to have shares in those companies.
So what we have here is a massive, government facilitated shift of wealth from the middle to the richest. The poorest effectively get let off anything they can't pay to the rich in profits, the rest of us just make up for it.
Why not just set up a social tariff..?
If having a warm home is a human right then set up a social tariff for the poorest households, have them pay less and then allow energy companies, within regulated reason, to charge whatever to the rest of us. Simply don't allow energy companies to profit from the poorest households.
The end result would be the same as the above, in that the rest of us would still pay for the poor and the profits, but it would avoids the bad-debt situation in the first place, which is BETTER because it gives the poorest more breathing room.
Alternative solutions
There are more radical solutions....
- Don't treat a warm home as a right and just let the market market. I.E. if people go into debt, just allow energy companies to cut them off. Personally, for the sake of saving £16 on my energy bill next year I'm not sure I'd like to go down this route, seeing as that this drastic measure would probably mean people dying (cold houses and health complications).
- Nationalise the energy industries... Don't allow profit to be made at all. If £2 billion in profit were divided by 30M households then that's around £60 a household saved per person, but this would solve all of the faff with OFGEM having to constantly set new energy price caps as fuel prices go up and down.
Given the figures and given the hassle with regulating the energy markets I think nationalisation might actually be worth a serious look, I certainly wouldn't rule it out.
That's IF you think a warm home in winter is a basic human need, and even a human right...?
Posted Using InLeo Alpha
Good post ! I'm not against nationalisation, but I'm also wary of it because it tends to lead to massive inefficiency and lack of customer/user focus. I'm old enough to remember when a lot of now private industries were nationalised, and they were a mess with far too much union control over how they were run.
But if they stay private, they need serious reform. Measures I can think of include;
But that's just my thoughts on it !
They all sound like very sensible and manageable options to me! Best of both public and private, we seem to have the worst mix!
Imagine loading the debt of a for-profit corporation on those unfortunate enough to have no choice but to be their client! Now I understand the efficiencies that can be built into a company when a board of directors has no choice but to focus solely on profit and shareholder value. Been there. Taking care of the poor is NOT generally in the book of those corporations but punishing the paying customers for a business model that results in bad debt seems like a malicious grift. BOO!
It's not the best model is it?!?
People used to be able to burn wood and coal to heat their homes. It's a primitive and effective option. We did this as there were plenty of gaps in the walls to ensure we wouldn't suffocate with carbon monoxide. We'd sit around the embers drinking hot tea.
Alternatively, cold is not without benefits. It's clearly survivable and tolerable to a degree.
Growing up, we largely depended on blankets at night. During the day, we wore layers. Showers were short. We used a bucket and water we heated on the stove to bathe. Growing up without heat was unpleasant. But it's not something that felt cruel or a slight to our dignity.
Very well said, and the UK is not THAT cold! It's poor quality housing mainly I think!
I think it is a need and a right, but it also makes sense.
Warm people stay healthy, go to work, pay taxes, don't need health or social care.
It's another one of those basic false economy things, for sure!
man it is so bad....
nice little happy article to cheer you up
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2024/feb/15/british-gas-profits-energy-bills-centrica
Grrr!
Oh that does look like a fun read!
enjoy!