The Homelessness Paradox: Beyond Financial Aid in Tackling the Crisis

I was seeing in the news some days back and I saw that a lot of people lived in shelters and so many living on the road side both foreigners and locals, and it looks like more homeless people are existing on a daily but then we still hear that people buy houses, so what could be going wrong.

Image Credit

Since the government is spending lots of money on people living in shelters, why do we still have people in these shelters and are there plans for shelters to become empty anytime soon? In countries like the United States, the government of Los Angeles spent 808 million dollars in 2022 on the Loss Angeles Homeless Service Authority so as to carter for homeless people, compared to the 63 million dollar spent in the year 2015 but this didn't cause a reduction in the number of homeless people with respect to the increase in amount of tax payers money spent on keeping people off the street, instead, the number of homeless people increased by 56%.

The intent of programs like this is to help social worker with no home get affordable accommodation to homeless individuals for a short period of time before they sort their housing problems. Although this program has a good intention, there are bad incentives to some of the organizations involved in doing this project with good intentions combined with bad management, and bad market conditions. I use the word some organizations because we know that when there are programs like this that involves lots of money, there are going to be bad actors that will want to get money off this.

Image Credit

There are a lot of non-profit partner agencies that are involved in this process. They get money from the government and they are suppose to serve the purpose of helping with home for these homeless people. One truth about this matter is that it is complicated, and throwing money at complicated problems doesn't mean fixing them.

Addressing homelessness involves more than financial investments. While the intentions behind these programs are noble, the presence of bad incentives, mismanagement, and the intricate nature of homelessness highlight the need for comprehensive, well-thought-out solutions. To make a meaningful impact, it's imperative to scrutinize these initiatives, ensuring they genuinely serve the purpose of alleviating homelessness rather than becoming breeding grounds for opportunistic actors. The complexity of the issue demands a nuanced approach that goes beyond monetary contributions, focusing on sustainable, community-driven strategies to tackle the root causes of homelessness.