Is This $105,000 Robot the Future of Cooking?

avatar
(Edited)

A robot in the kitchen—that's something you don't see every day, but surely we should have seen this coming. X-AiR robot designed by Moley Robotics is made to [sort of] do all your cooking. It does have some limitations, though, including it's whooping cost of $105,000.

One idea behind such a robot would be for those that do not have the time to make food, like after a long day at work. It's much more convenient to choose a dish on the controls and have it do all the cooking.

The founder, Dr. Mark Oleynik, had the idea of helping people eat better and rely more on fresh food rather than preservatives [on foods to eat later]. Automating fresh cooking, he thinks, could greatly reduce dependence on processed foods.

There was an earlier version of the robot—a two-armed type that costs nearly $330,000—something that was even way too high for the calibre of people it was designed for. So a much simpler, stripped-down version that has a single arm was designed.

image.png

There are three sections to the robot that all contribute to its overall estimated cost of around $105,000. The robot arm (X-AiR), a control tablet, and specific kitchen fixtures. To have it functional, you'll need a new tabletop, custom shelving units, and a cooktop.

X-AiR doesn't have a native vision system to allow it to sense and engage with its environment, so it moves around with memory of its surroundings, like where the ingredients, pots, and untensils should be. That is, you would have to have already prepared the ingredients and placed them at designated positions for the robot to grab and effectively do the cooking.

image.png

Moley has its own in-house chef, James Taylor, who adapts each recipe so it can be made by a one-armed robot. The company says it hopes to add two or three new recipes each month and that if you have a family dish you’d love to see automated, you can send it in. Oleynik said the movements are mapped onto the robot after watching a human chef prepare the same meal. And that, once it had learnt what to do, the robot would be far less error-prone than its human counterpart. ~ Engadget

Having the robot do all the cooking does sound like a fancy idea, but someone has to do the preparation of the ingredients if the robot is unable to do it. And it makes one wonder, really, "Is it really worth it?" I mean, the interesting part of cooking, if there's any, would be the actually cooking and not peeling the potatoes or grating the carrots, or even the teary experience of dicing onions.

It would all be too complicated to design such a robot to also do the preparation. There are far too many variables to consider. And also, putting blades onto a robot is a risky and dangerous deal.

image.png

Another limitation is how you can't really make immediate modifications to the meal. You may not have an ingredient missing—it would only not know that it's absent—but you can't just include a new ingredient for it to factor in. It's not smart. Just an automated system.

On the bright side, since people that can afford it are likely to always have the right ingredients for their dishes, it could be a win situation for them to be able to save time when they are busy.

If, however, it is only an automated system—not one that has vision or adequate sensors to adapt to changes and obtain feedback from its environment—there could be potential mistakes during cooking. And clearly, zero preparation means no cooking, and the robot just sits idle.

Monitise your content on Hive via InLeo and truly own your account. Create your free account in a few minutes here! Here's a navigation guide.


All images from Engadget

Posted Using InLeo Alpha



0
0
0.000
10 comments
avatar
(Edited)

So in the end it’s still a human cooking?
I mean if the human has to be prepare the ingredients when the robot is unable to do it, then…
I was going to shout hallelujah on behalf of those of us who can’t cook but I’ll keep it because this definitely doesn’t sound worth it.

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

Just hold your hallelujah like that. Lmao. It's just another toy for the rich. Someone has to program, then you have to prepare the ingredients, just for it to make kenkey. I'll go buy me a full self-driving car, please.

0
0
0.000
avatar

This woman, just employ me instead of purchasing a robot. I can prepare ingredients and also make the meal.

0
0
0.000
avatar

it's good but not for me. I would love to cook for myself as I can't afford to lose so much money. People say it is right that the future world's advanced facilities are for rich people.

0
0
0.000
avatar

People say it is right that the future world's advanced facilities are for rich people.

Sounds just about right, sir. I think cooking is one of the things we shouldn't automate, actually.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Why wouldn't they just employ me instead of this stress, it doesn't make sense for me to prepare the ingredients first and expect the robot to make the meal.

Waste of time and money, some people will say this is a poor man mentality but this innovation is just another silly one out there.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Chef George has been seriously angered. It really is a waste of money. But you know, the rich be doing rich things...

0
0
0.000
avatar

but someone has to do the preparation of the ingredients if the robot is unable to do it.

This is something to really consider. You are tired already and you have to prepare all the fresh veggies for the automated robot to take over.
Nevertheless, it's a kudos to them, invention is no easy task. They'll gradually build upon the tech I guess.

0
0
0.000
avatar

You are tired already and you have to prepare all the fresh veggies for the automated robot to take over.

Indeed, but the idea is probably to set them up way before you "get tired" from work. But then, it's still work. Same thing, really. It's a great feat anyway.

0
0
0.000