RE: As a whale, why are you not funding any idea on Hive?

I'm sorry you see it that way, it's just a raw truth, what's Hive's tokenomics? Does it have one?

When I say zero economically sound infrastructure I'm referring to the Hive tokens utility, so far, there's staking Hive to curate, gain RC and get a bit of interest for simply staking, plus governance, but that does not mean much to the average user and if "nothing is feeding value" into the token itself because this is all inflation rewards it isn't economically sound.

When I joined Hive, majority of the people here were against ads, for so long I watched everyone hate ads and this actually tended to inflaunce each new user, even myself, but moving forward I realized it made no sense, if you have no ads, no subscriptions, just tokens minted everyday and occasionally bought by the "Koreans" as they always say out of speculation, how can you grow?

The only reason there's been so much debate on the reward pool is because there's no external structure feeding value back to Hive.

Peakd is a Hive funded frontend right? Why isn't there anything at all that feeds value back to stake holders?

If I am wrong, I would appreciate you point me to what is there to know that I don't already know because this post isn't intended to spread negativity but to point the community to the things we should be channelling our energy towards.

Did you see the post "Does Hive even exist?"

Did you see what taskmaster published afterwards : What Hive Really Is And How It Gets Confused

If you pay attention to both content, you'd see we're saying the same thing.

We are stagnating because what should be done isn't being done.

To make it absolutely clear, if Hive wants more users there are certain things that needs to be done and it is different from what should be done to get more developers.

Now when I say users this is a combination of content consumers and content creators and if you ask me, content creators are more important, with them, more consumers will be attracted.