Why CBDCs Face an Uphill Battle

Indeed, what the Deutsche Bank survey of consumer payment preferences brings to light is a pretty interesting paradox characterizing today's digital world. In spite of the relentless march of technology, it would appear that digital currencies are behind people's minds, whereas good old-fashioned cash still occupies a special place in the heart and wallet.

Source

This is not about simple nostalgia or aversion to changing things. What this does, in effect speaks volumes about how deeply concerning the people are in regard to privacy, control, and indeed generally about the position of government in their financial lives.

These findings are striking in context, as we do live in a world where the norm seems to be shifting towards digital payments.

Yet so many believe that no matter what may transpire, cash has a relevance to it that will always endure. Whichever part of the world one speaks about, Europeans, Brits, and Americans alike still prefer the old, traditional ways of paying for goods.

What is behind this love for cash?

It would appear that privacy is perhaps the most overriding factor driving this attachment in light of data breaches and constant surveillance. Cash offers anonymity at a level that digital currencies simply cannot match.

It is telling, too, that even against cryptocurrencies, CBDCs also lack much in terms of privacy, many respondents say.

All this preference for privacy is not, of course, only about not wanting to disclose a transaction to prying eyes. Rather, it is a matter of autonomy, self-determination over one's life with money.

Cash affords a certain level of personal freedom that many people fear would be eroded by the introduction of CBDCs. After all, a digital currency controlled by the central bank may be used as some kind of tool for surveillance or, worse, to exert control.

This brings into interesting view the divide in attitudes toward government-backed digital currencies versus private cryptocurrencies.

People are very skeptical about the two, but again, it is interesting to note how some people would prefer a government-managed cryptocurrency over a private one. This might be indicative that while people may be wary about CBDCs, they are not entirely set against the idea of digital currencies, they simply want to feel assured about their privacy and control.

From a more general standpoint, the survey portrays critical questions about the future of money and the role of the central bank. If ever CBDCs were to reach widespread adoption, central banks would be forced to confront such concerns related to privacy.

They need to find an appropriate balance between efficiency and cost reduction advantages given by digital currencies and privacy protection that consumers obviously would want.

The point being made is that the stellar preference of cash is a reason to maintain a diversified portfolio for payments. While digital payments do bring great conveniences, cash is an important alternative for those who might fall outside of digital financial system inclusion.

But the more things change, it would appear, the more it is becoming obvious that digital currencies will not come about with the sweep of a pen.

People cling to cash, and attempts to retire these particular denominations will be met with serious deep-seated resistance. Central banks and regulators will have to step with care lest they alienate a public which still looks upon physical currency as tangible security.

Posted Using InLeo Alpha