It is Literally Named Threads
Zuck has used his very popular innovation strategy to create his own version of Twitter, the World famous 'copy' and 'paste'. It is a shameless strategy that has served him so well so far, and he definitely isn't shy about admitting his preference for this style of competition. If you noticed however, it wasn't just the platform that was copied off Twitter, even the name would've had a couple of us in the Leofinance community smiling or frowning, depending on how you receive it.
According to him, Twitter 'missed the opportunity to be the platform for having conversations' and he has decided to deliver us with his version of the Messiah. It's all nonsense if you look deeper objectively and abstain from immersing yourself in left or right ideologies. It is an ideological War going on and nobody was just going to let Elon do whatever he pleased. We'll see how his Threads pan out though, and whether Twitter really is doomed.
Politics in Play
I do take exception to his opinions about his platform being the needed platform for a necessary public conversation. Twitter does have its faults under Elon, but swapping right leaning for left leaning or extremely left ideology cannot be the balance we need to have such a platform. The World is already polarized as it is with various ideologies, and chances are we'd just have an echo chamber of a platform where left leaning people join his threads and right leaning people remain on Twitter. For me personally, I think we should be concerned about what's in it for us than jumping on one platform to another to spill vitriol or start Trolling.
Ask Yourself
What's in it for you though? Why waste endless hours on a platform that offers nothing in return? Would you prefer a place where free speech is allowed or not? Does Every moment spent feel satisfying or like a waste? I think we really need to consider these kind of questions before jumping from one social media platform to the next. So far, most mainstream social platforms with the exception of YouTube haven't done much for their users except sell their data. Are we really comfortable just letting that continue?
I have also realized that most people would rather take what's presented to them rather than struggle to create what they want. Many will join Threads not necessarily because they like the platform, but because others are joining. It explains the difficulty of building a platform from scratch and why other alternative platforms such as Bluesky and Leofinance struggle for traction. Of course nobody wants to talk in an empty space, but many these days are comfortable talking into echo chambers.
Ahead of the Curve
I think whatever Zuck is trying to create with his media platforms is already on full display on Hive, just without the added benefits that should accompany them. There isn't any real talk of a partner program and users don't necessarily feel like stakeholders. Instead there's massive revenue to be made off user data. This is why there's a lot of hope for the Hive platform. Perhaps one day people will realize that they really should be getting something in return for all the time they spend on those platforms other than unnecessary agitations
I totally agree! Hive has also microblogging platform @dbuzz Hopefully those people in web2 see the potential and the many things web3 (especially hive) has to offer. !PGM
BUY AND STAKE THE PGM TO SEND A LOT OF TOKENS!
The tokens that the command sends are: 0.1 PGM-0.1 LVL-0.1 THGAMING-0.05 DEC-15 SBT-1 STARBITS-[0.00000001 BTC (SWAP.BTC) only if you have 2500 PGM in stake or more ]
5000 PGM IN STAKE = 2x rewards!
Discord
Support the curation account @ pgm-curator with a delegation 10 HP - 50 HP - 100 HP - 500 HP - 1000 HP
Get potential votes from @ pgm-curator by paying in PGM, here is a guide
I'm a bot, if you want a hand ask @ zottone444
The question people should be asking with these platforms is 'what's in it for us' before they join
I read recently that Twitter is threatening to sue Meta over the Threads app. They pretty much did a copy and paste job with a few tweaks here and there. I think asking the question of what we're getting from using it is really important, we have to learn to be aware of the intricacies that are happening in the background. Leofinance's threads is indeed ahead of the curve, it shows we're heading at the right direction.
I must've got 40 notifications over the past 24 hours about people using Threads (from Instagram). It's getting to be a bit much. Personally, I don't think he can replace Twitter with this, no more than I could replace Facebook if I made a carbon copy tomorrow. Many have tried.
I don't think Zuck has any interest in free speech. The idea alone of one man owning all the major social communication platforms is appalling.
Here's to hoping.
Worst case scenario it'll only create two big conversation echo chambers...where hopefully we'd find more peace
Worst case scenario it'll only create two big conversation echo chambers...where hopefully we'd find more peace
We've been in crypto long enough to know that once the novelty of "shiny new thing" goes away the likelihood of a swift bleedout is quite high.
We'll be here when reality sets in