RE: Does Solana have a future?
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
I would tend to agree. I think most platform plays will prove to be uncompetitive for one reason or another - UNLESS - they can do something ETH cannot - AND - they become cross-chain compatible with ETH. If they do that, then they don't actually HAVE to be decentralized, because they can sort of piggy back on ETH. As ETH continues to develop, however, you have to revisit some of these chains.
E.g., MATIC has done extraordinarily well because they followed this strategy. However, it isn't clear to me that ETH with fully integrated sharding does not obsolete MATIC.
0
0
0.000
Yep, I've gotta go down the MATIC rabbit hole a bit deeper now that Ethereum has finished its upgrade.
In my mind, the entire use case for Polygon was just a cheaper Ethereum.
Well now that Ethereum fees aren't as much of an issue, why would you use Polygon??
I'm sure its deeper than that once I start looking into it, but that's my thinking at the moment.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
Exactly.