Stablecoins Poses A New Challenge for Emerging Economies

In the recent news, it was announced that the Financial Stability Board- FSB would focus on stablecoins, notably those used in developing and emerging economies. This drew my interest, and I believe it may be useful to talk about. For anyone who might not know, the essential thinking behind a stablecoin makes it an instance of cryptocurrency pegged to some stable assets, like the United States dollar or gold. What's being done here is to try and provide the benefits of digital currency, without those mad price swings we often see with Bitcoin or Ethereum.

Sourced

This is no surprise to any party because the FSB has an interest in stablecoins. Following the crypto world, I can tell that stablecoins are gaining momentum very fast. They seem to give users some sense of security because their value doesn't alter much. On this basis, it becomes attractive where the local currency might appear unstable.

Stablecoins can be an escape route for such people to safeguard their money against the loss of value. This goes especially true with the countries that have incredibly high inflation rates or just too unpredictable economies. With this growing popularity, however, new challenges arise. According to the FSB, stablecoins in emerging and developing economies may be a source of monetary policy and capital flow management problems. What this means is that it would be much more difficult for governments to control their money supply if, all of a sudden, everybody started using stablecoins, which may lead to uncontrolled inflation or even financial instability.

This concern is valid in my view. Imagine a country where users start using a stablecoin instead of the domestic currency because they trust it more. This can undermine the local economy and make it difficult for any effective monetary policies to be executed by the government. If the money were to move out in massive amounts to buy stablecoins, for instance, this would further undermine the value of the local currency.

This would set off a vicious cycle in which more and more people give up the local currency, aggravating the economic situation.

Another essential element brought forth by the FSB is the regulation of stablecoins. As it currently stands, there is a hot debate between the major economic groups, the G7 and G20, over how to treat stablecoins. The G7 includes some of the world's biggest economies, with different views from the G20, including emerging economies.

Such a significant gap in opinions makes creating a unified approach to regulation very hard. Of course, I believe this is the core issue: without evident rulemaking, stablecoin risks might further increase.

This will require a balance, in my view. On one hand, the potential of stablecoins for financial inclusion is excellent. They can help people in developing countries save and transfer money more efficiently and at lower costs. On the other hand, having no regulation on this and how it can be misused is very worrisome.

Sourced

We have witnessed how unregulated financial products can lead to crises, and no one wants a repeat of that. One potential answer is a collaborative approach whereby governments, international bodies, and the private sector can develop an oversight framework that will harness stablecoin benefits while containing risks. This would entail standards setting on transparency, regular audits of stablecoin reserves, and consumer protection mechanisms.

Looking Ahead, I do share the view that the initiative of the FSB to delve deeper into detailed study on stablecoins is quite positively oriented. It proves some type of realization of the potential and risks involved. We want to stay ahead, looking forward to an evermore digital world, not handling its issues reactively but proactively.

Posted Using InLeo Alpha