RE: Trying out the ChatGPT to ask it to write a post: How is it going to affect Hive's blogging activities?
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
ChatGPT isn't very good at writing articles. It can write them if you ask, but they come across as very generic sounding and are devoid of substance. You can use GPT 3 and it's latest Da Vinci algorithm to write articles, but you still get articles that aren't very good.
I think AI tools like these are good for generating ideas, but writing fully fledged articles, you'll always be able to tell because they sound so formal and robotic.
Having said all of that, I see so many garbage posts that are not even spell checked and lack any substance, "Why I think Hive is the best in the entire world!!" type things posted. Maybe ChatGPT will improve the quality of this place.
If people are using them to generate articles and then writing in their own original parts on top or rewriting existing parts, I think that's fine. At the end of the day, I'll always upvote high quality content regardless.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
They don't always sound formal and robotic. You can tell an AI to sound like a certain writer, and it will write in their style.
I am waiting for when the AI can simulate my style, cause having a bot who can write like Edgar Allen Poe is cool, but kinda useless for me.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
In my experience, the formality is around how it structures articles. If you're writing something academic, I can see the benefit. But, I tend to write in an informal style with hints of formal thrown in when I need to dive deep into something. But, the stuff I've tried generating sounds like a computer very much wrote it. I like the style emulation idea. One day, you'll see AI that can be trained on your emails and other writings to emulate your style.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta