[Eng./Esp.] Nᴇɪᴛʜᴇʀ Sᴄɪᴇɴᴄᴇ, ɴᴏʀ Pʜɪʟᴏsᴏᴘʜʏ…, ɪᴛ ɪs ʟɪғᴇ. || Nɪ ʟᴀ Cɪᴇɴᴄɪᴀ, ɴɪ ʟᴀ Fɪʟᴏsᴏғɪ́ᴀ…, ᴇs ʟᴀ ᴠɪᴅᴀ.

24 days ago

_{Si prefieres la versión en español, haz clic en el siguiente enlace 👉 AQUÍ}

ℕ𝕖𝕚𝕥𝕙𝕖𝕣 𝕊𝕔𝕚𝕖𝕟𝕔𝕖, 𝕟𝕠𝕣 ℙ𝕙𝕚𝕝𝕠𝕤𝕠𝕡𝕙𝕪…,

𝕚𝕥 𝕚𝕤 𝕝𝕚𝕗𝕖.

𝙰𝚜 𝚊 𝚖𝚊𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚖𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚌𝚒𝚊𝚗 𝚋𝚢 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚏𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚒𝚘𝚗, 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚚𝚞𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗 𝚘𝚏 𝚑𝚘𝚠 𝚜𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚎 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚙𝚑𝚒𝚕𝚘𝚜𝚘𝚙𝚑𝚢 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚎𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚌𝚑𝚊𝚕𝚕𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚎 𝚎𝚊𝚌𝚑 𝚘𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛 𝚑𝚊𝚜 𝚋𝚎𝚎𝚗 𝚊 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚝 𝚒𝚗 𝚖𝚢 𝚛𝚎𝚏𝚕𝚎𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚜. 𝙾𝚏𝚝𝚎𝚗, 𝙸 𝚏𝚒𝚗𝚍 𝚖𝚢𝚜𝚎𝚕𝚏 𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚗𝚊𝚕𝚕𝚢 𝚍𝚎𝚋𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚠𝚑𝚒𝚌𝚑 𝚒𝚜 𝚖𝚘𝚛𝚎 𝚙𝚘𝚠𝚎𝚛𝚏𝚞𝚕: 𝚜𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚎 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑 𝚒𝚝𝚜 𝚎𝚖𝚙𝚒𝚛𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚕 𝚛𝚒𝚐𝚘𝚞𝚛, 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚜𝚘𝚗 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑 𝚒𝚝𝚜 𝚕𝚘𝚐𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚕 𝚌𝚕𝚊𝚛𝚒𝚝𝚢, 𝚘𝚛 𝚙𝚑𝚒𝚕𝚘𝚜𝚘𝚙𝚑𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚕 𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚗𝚔𝚒𝚗𝚐, 𝚠𝚑𝚒𝚌𝚑 𝙸 𝚜𝚘𝚖𝚎𝚝𝚒𝚖𝚎𝚜 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚌𝚎𝚒𝚟𝚎 𝚊𝚜 𝚙𝚊𝚜𝚜𝚒𝚟𝚎 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚎. 𝙷𝚘𝚠𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚛, 𝚊𝚜 𝙸 𝚍𝚎𝚕𝚟𝚎 𝚍𝚎𝚎𝚙𝚎𝚛 𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚜𝚎 𝚒𝚜𝚜𝚞𝚎𝚜, 𝙸 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚜𝚎 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚋𝚘𝚝𝚑 𝚜𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚎 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚙𝚑𝚒𝚕𝚘𝚜𝚘𝚙𝚑𝚢 𝚑𝚊𝚟𝚎 𝚌𝚛𝚞𝚌𝚒𝚊𝚕 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚎𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚛𝚢 𝚛𝚘𝚕𝚎𝚜 𝚒𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚚𝚞𝚎𝚜𝚝 𝚏𝚘𝚛 𝚔𝚗𝚘𝚠𝚕𝚎𝚍𝚐𝚎.

𝚂𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚎, 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑 𝚒𝚝𝚜 𝚎𝚖𝚙𝚒𝚛𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚕 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚎𝚡𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚕 𝚖𝚎𝚝𝚑𝚘𝚍𝚜, 𝚜𝚎𝚎𝚔𝚜 𝚝𝚘 𝚞𝚗𝚍𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚠𝚘𝚛𝚕𝚍 𝚝𝚑𝚛𝚘𝚞𝚐𝚑 𝚘𝚋𝚜𝚎𝚛𝚟𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚎𝚡𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗. 𝙸𝚝 𝚒𝚜 𝚊 𝚙𝚘𝚠𝚎𝚛𝚏𝚞𝚕 𝚝𝚘𝚘𝚕 𝚏𝚘𝚛 𝚞𝚗𝚛𝚊𝚟𝚎𝚕𝚕𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚖𝚢𝚜𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚎𝚜 𝚘𝚏 𝚗𝚊𝚝𝚞𝚛𝚎, 𝚎𝚗𝚊𝚋𝚕𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚞𝚜 𝚝𝚘 𝚖𝚊𝚔𝚎 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚘𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚎𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚑𝚊𝚟𝚎 𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚜𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚖𝚎𝚍 𝚘𝚞𝚛 𝚕𝚒𝚟𝚎𝚜. 𝚂𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚎'𝚜 𝚊𝚋𝚒𝚕𝚒𝚝𝚢 𝚝𝚘 𝚐𝚎𝚗𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚝𝚎 𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚏𝚒𝚊𝚋𝚕𝚎 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚛𝚎𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚍𝚞𝚌𝚒𝚋𝚕𝚎 𝚔𝚗𝚘𝚠𝚕𝚎𝚍𝚐𝚎 𝚒𝚜 𝚞𝚗𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊𝚕𝚕𝚎𝚕𝚎𝚍. 𝙵𝚛𝚘𝚖 𝙴𝚒𝚗𝚜𝚝𝚎𝚒𝚗'𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚘𝚛𝚢 𝚘𝚏 𝚛𝚎𝚕𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚒𝚝𝚢 𝚝𝚘 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚘𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚢 𝚘𝚏 𝙳𝙽𝙰, 𝚜𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚎 𝚑𝚊𝚜 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚟𝚎𝚗 𝚝𝚘 𝚋𝚎 𝚊𝚗 𝚞𝚗𝚜𝚝𝚘𝚙𝚙𝚊𝚋𝚕𝚎 𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚌𝚎 𝚒𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚊𝚍𝚟𝚊𝚗𝚌𝚎𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝 𝚘𝚏 𝚑𝚞𝚖𝚊𝚗 𝚔𝚗𝚘𝚠𝚕𝚎𝚍𝚐𝚎.

https://divulgaciencia.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/DALL%C2%B7E-2024-07-09-13.08.10-Cover-image-concept-1_-An-abstract-illustration-showing-a-scientist-and-a-philosopher-standing-back-to-back-each-holding-a-part-of-a-globe-that-symbo.webp

𝙿𝚑𝚒𝚕𝚘𝚜𝚘𝚙𝚑𝚢, 𝚘𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚘𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛 𝚑𝚊𝚗𝚍, 𝚍𝚎𝚊𝚕𝚜 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑 𝚖𝚘𝚛𝚎 𝚏𝚞𝚗𝚍𝚊𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚕 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚊𝚋𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚌𝚝 𝚚𝚞𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚜. 𝚆𝚑𝚒𝚕𝚎 𝚜𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚎 𝚝𝚎𝚕𝚕𝚜 𝚞𝚜 𝚑𝚘𝚠 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚠𝚘𝚛𝚕𝚍 𝚠𝚘𝚛𝚔𝚜, 𝚙𝚑𝚒𝚕𝚘𝚜𝚘𝚙𝚑𝚢 𝚊𝚜𝚔𝚜 𝚞𝚜 𝚠𝚑𝚢 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚠𝚘𝚛𝚕𝚍 𝚒𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚠𝚊𝚢 𝚒𝚝 𝚒𝚜 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚠𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚘𝚞𝚛 𝚙𝚕𝚊𝚌𝚎 𝚒𝚗 𝚒𝚝 𝚒𝚜. 𝙿𝚑𝚒𝚕𝚘𝚜𝚘𝚙𝚑𝚢 𝚊𝚍𝚍𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚎𝚜 𝚒𝚜𝚜𝚞𝚎𝚜 𝚜𝚞𝚌𝚑 𝚊𝚜 𝚎𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚌𝚜, 𝚎𝚡𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚎, 𝚔𝚗𝚘𝚠𝚕𝚎𝚍𝚐𝚎 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚝𝚢, 𝚘𝚏𝚏𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚊 𝚏𝚛𝚊𝚖𝚎𝚠𝚘𝚛𝚔 𝚏𝚘𝚛 𝚛𝚎𝚏𝚕𝚎𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚘𝚗 𝚘𝚞𝚛 𝚘𝚠𝚗 𝚕𝚒𝚟𝚎𝚜 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚠𝚘𝚛𝚕𝚍 𝚊𝚛𝚘𝚞𝚗𝚍 𝚞𝚜. 𝙰𝚕𝚝𝚑𝚘𝚞𝚐𝚑 𝚒𝚝 𝚜𝚘𝚖𝚎𝚝𝚒𝚖𝚎𝚜 𝚜𝚎𝚎𝚖𝚜 𝚙𝚊𝚜𝚜𝚒𝚟𝚎, 𝚙𝚑𝚒𝚕𝚘𝚜𝚘𝚙𝚑𝚢 𝚒𝚜 𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚒𝚊𝚕 𝚏𝚘𝚛 𝚚𝚞𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚋𝚊𝚜𝚒𝚌 𝚊𝚜𝚜𝚞𝚖𝚙𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚜 𝚘𝚗 𝚠𝚑𝚒𝚌𝚑 𝚜𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚒𝚏𝚒𝚌 𝚔𝚗𝚘𝚠𝚕𝚎𝚍𝚐𝚎 𝚒𝚜 𝚋𝚞𝚒𝚕𝚝.

𝙸𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚍𝚎𝚋𝚊𝚝𝚎 𝚘𝚟𝚎𝚛 𝚠𝚑𝚒𝚌𝚑 𝚒𝚜 𝚖𝚘𝚛𝚎 𝚙𝚘𝚠𝚎𝚛𝚏𝚞𝚕, 𝚜𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚎 𝚘𝚛 𝚙𝚑𝚒𝚕𝚘𝚜𝚘𝚙𝚑𝚢, 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚊𝚗𝚜𝚠𝚎𝚛 𝚒𝚜 𝚗𝚘𝚝 𝚜𝚒𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚎. 𝙱𝚘𝚝𝚑 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚒𝚙𝚕𝚒𝚗𝚎𝚜 𝚑𝚊𝚟𝚎 𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚝𝚑𝚜 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚠𝚎𝚊𝚔𝚗𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚎𝚜. 𝚂𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚎 𝚒𝚜 𝚞𝚗𝚍𝚘𝚞𝚋𝚝𝚎𝚍𝚕𝚢 𝚙𝚘𝚠𝚎𝚛𝚏𝚞𝚕 𝚒𝚗 𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚖𝚜 𝚘𝚏 𝚒𝚝𝚜 𝚊𝚋𝚒𝚕𝚒𝚝𝚢 𝚝𝚘 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚍𝚞𝚌𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚌𝚛𝚎𝚝𝚎 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚙𝚛𝚊𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚕 𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚞𝚕𝚝𝚜. 𝙷𝚘𝚠𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚛, 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑𝚘𝚞𝚝 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚐𝚞𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚗𝚌𝚎 𝚘𝚏 𝚙𝚑𝚒𝚕𝚘𝚜𝚘𝚙𝚑𝚢, 𝚜𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚞𝚕𝚍 𝚋𝚎𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚎 𝚕𝚘𝚜𝚝 𝚒𝚗 𝚊 𝚜𝚎𝚊 𝚘𝚏 𝚖𝚎𝚊𝚗𝚒𝚗𝚐𝚕𝚎𝚜𝚜 𝚍𝚊𝚝𝚊. 𝙿𝚑𝚒𝚕𝚘𝚜𝚘𝚙𝚑𝚢, 𝚠𝚑𝚒𝚕𝚎 𝚘𝚏𝚝𝚎𝚗 𝚖𝚘𝚛𝚎 𝚊𝚋𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚌𝚝, 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚟𝚒𝚍𝚎𝚜 𝚞𝚜 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚡𝚝 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚞𝚗𝚍𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚗𝚎𝚌𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚊𝚛𝚢 𝚝𝚘 𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚝 𝚜𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚒𝚏𝚒𝚌 𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚞𝚕𝚝𝚜 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚊𝚙𝚙𝚕𝚢 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚖 𝚖𝚎𝚊𝚗𝚒𝚗𝚐𝚏𝚞𝚕𝚕𝚢 𝚒𝚗 𝚘𝚞𝚛 𝚕𝚒𝚟𝚎𝚜.

𝙸𝚗 𝚖𝚢 𝚎𝚡𝚙𝚕𝚘𝚛𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚜, 𝙸 𝚊𝚕𝚜𝚘 𝚗𝚘𝚝𝚒𝚌𝚎𝚍 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚘𝚏𝚝𝚎𝚗 𝚗𝚘 𝚘𝚗𝚎 𝚜𝚎𝚎𝚖𝚜 𝚝𝚘 𝚋𝚎 𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚎𝚍 𝚒𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚜𝚎 𝚒𝚜𝚜𝚞𝚎𝚜. 𝙸𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚠𝚑𝚒𝚛𝚕𝚠𝚒𝚗𝚍 𝚘𝚏 𝚖𝚘𝚍𝚎𝚛𝚗 𝚕𝚒𝚏𝚎, 𝚙𝚎𝚘𝚙𝚕𝚎 𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚍 𝚝𝚘 𝚏𝚘𝚌𝚞𝚜 𝚘𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚍𝚒𝚊𝚝𝚎 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚙𝚛𝚊𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚕, 𝚕𝚎𝚊𝚟𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚊𝚜𝚒𝚍𝚎 𝚍𝚎𝚎𝚙 𝚙𝚑𝚒𝚕𝚘𝚜𝚘𝚙𝚑𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚕 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚜𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚒𝚏𝚒𝚌 𝚛𝚎𝚏𝚕𝚎𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚜. 𝙷𝚘𝚠𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚛, 𝙸 𝚏𝚒𝚛𝚖𝚕𝚢 𝚋𝚎𝚕𝚒𝚎𝚟𝚎 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚜𝚎 𝚍𝚎𝚋𝚊𝚝𝚎𝚜 𝚊𝚛𝚎 𝚏𝚞𝚗𝚍𝚊𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚕 𝚝𝚘 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚐𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚜 𝚘𝚏 𝚑𝚞𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚒𝚝𝚢. 𝚂𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚎 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑𝚘𝚞𝚝 𝚙𝚑𝚒𝚕𝚘𝚜𝚘𝚙𝚑𝚢 𝚌𝚊𝚗 𝚋𝚎𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚎 𝚋𝚕𝚒𝚗𝚍 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚍𝚒𝚛𝚎𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚕𝚎𝚜𝚜, 𝚠𝚑𝚒𝚕𝚎 𝚙𝚑𝚒𝚕𝚘𝚜𝚘𝚙𝚑𝚢 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑𝚘𝚞𝚝 𝚜𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚎 𝚌𝚊𝚗 𝚋𝚎𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚎 𝚜𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚕𝚎 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚗𝚎𝚌𝚝𝚎𝚍 𝚏𝚛𝚘𝚖 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚝𝚢.

https://pymstatic.com/6004/conversions/diferencias-ciencia-filosofia-wide_webp.webp

𝚃𝚘 𝚒𝚕𝚕𝚞𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚝𝚎 𝚑𝚘𝚠 𝚜𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚎 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚙𝚑𝚒𝚕𝚘𝚜𝚘𝚙𝚑𝚢 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚎𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚌𝚑𝚊𝚕𝚕𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚎 𝚎𝚊𝚌𝚑 𝚘𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛, 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚒𝚍𝚎𝚛 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚏𝚒𝚎𝚕𝚍 𝚘𝚏 𝚋𝚒𝚘𝚎𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚌𝚜. 𝚂𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚒𝚏𝚒𝚌 𝚒𝚗𝚗𝚘𝚟𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚜 𝚒𝚗 𝚖𝚎𝚍𝚒𝚌𝚒𝚗𝚎 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚋𝚒𝚘𝚝𝚎𝚌𝚑𝚗𝚘𝚕𝚘𝚐𝚢, 𝚜𝚞𝚌𝚑 𝚊𝚜 𝚐𝚎𝚗𝚎 𝚎𝚍𝚒𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚌𝚕𝚘𝚗𝚒𝚗𝚐, 𝚛𝚊𝚒𝚜𝚎 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚏𝚘𝚞𝚗𝚍 𝚎𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚕 𝚚𝚞𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚜𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚎 𝚊𝚕𝚘𝚗𝚎 𝚌𝚊𝚗𝚗𝚘𝚝 𝚊𝚗𝚜𝚠𝚎𝚛. 𝚃𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚒𝚜 𝚠𝚑𝚎𝚛𝚎 𝚙𝚑𝚒𝚕𝚘𝚜𝚘𝚙𝚑𝚢 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚎𝚜 𝚒𝚗, 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚟𝚒𝚍𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚊𝚗 𝚎𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚕 𝚏𝚛𝚊𝚖𝚎𝚠𝚘𝚛𝚔 𝚝𝚘 𝚊𝚜𝚜𝚎𝚜𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚒𝚖𝚙𝚊𝚌𝚝𝚜 𝚘𝚏 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚜𝚎 𝚊𝚍𝚟𝚊𝚗𝚌𝚎𝚜 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚐𝚞𝚒𝚍𝚎 𝚘𝚞𝚛 𝚍𝚎𝚌𝚒𝚜𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚜.

𝙸𝚝 𝚒𝚜 𝚝𝚒𝚖𝚎 𝚏𝚘𝚛 𝚜𝚘 𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚢 𝚠𝚘𝚛𝚍𝚜, 𝚎𝚖𝚙𝚝𝚢 𝚏𝚘𝚛 𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚢; 𝚒𝚗 𝚜𝚑𝚘𝚛𝚝: 𝚜𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚎 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚙𝚑𝚒𝚕𝚘𝚜𝚘𝚙𝚑𝚢 𝚊𝚛𝚎 𝚝𝚠𝚘 𝚜𝚒𝚍𝚎𝚜 𝚘𝚏 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚜𝚊𝚖𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚒𝚗 𝚒𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚚𝚞𝚎𝚜𝚝 𝚏𝚘𝚛 𝚔𝚗𝚘𝚠𝚕𝚎𝚍𝚐𝚎. 𝚃𝚑𝚎𝚢 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚎𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝 𝚎𝚊𝚌𝚑 𝚘𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛 𝚋𝚢 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚟𝚒𝚍𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚍𝚒𝚏𝚏𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚗𝚝 𝚋𝚞𝚝 𝚎𝚚𝚞𝚊𝚕𝚕𝚢 𝚒𝚖𝚙𝚘𝚛𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚝 𝚖𝚎𝚝𝚑𝚘𝚍𝚜 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚏𝚛𝚊𝚖𝚎𝚠𝚘𝚛𝚔𝚜 𝚏𝚘𝚛 𝚞𝚗𝚍𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚠𝚘𝚛𝚕𝚍. 𝚆𝚑𝚒𝚕𝚎 𝚜𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚎 𝚐𝚒𝚟𝚎𝚜 𝚞𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚝𝚘𝚘𝚕𝚜 𝚝𝚘 𝚎𝚡𝚙𝚕𝚘𝚛𝚎 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚘𝚟𝚎𝚛, 𝚙𝚑𝚒𝚕𝚘𝚜𝚘𝚙𝚑𝚢 𝚐𝚒𝚟𝚎𝚜 𝚞𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚙𝚞𝚛𝚙𝚘𝚜𝚎 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚡𝚝 𝚏𝚘𝚛 𝚝𝚑𝚘𝚜𝚎 𝚎𝚡𝚙𝚕𝚘𝚛𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚜. 𝙱𝚘𝚝𝚑 𝚏𝚒𝚎𝚕𝚍𝚜, 𝚝𝚑𝚘𝚞𝚐𝚑 𝚜𝚘𝚖𝚎𝚝𝚒𝚖𝚎𝚜 𝚊𝚝 𝚘𝚍𝚍𝚜, 𝚗𝚎𝚎𝚍 𝚎𝚊𝚌𝚑 𝚘𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛 𝚒𝚗 𝚘𝚛𝚍𝚎𝚛 𝚝𝚘 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚞𝚌𝚝 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚎𝚝𝚎 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚖𝚎𝚊𝚗𝚒𝚗𝚐𝚏𝚞𝚕 𝚔𝚗𝚘𝚠𝚕𝚎𝚍𝚐𝚎. 𝙰𝚗𝚍 𝚠𝚑𝚒𝚕𝚎 𝚒𝚝 𝚖𝚊𝚢 𝚜𝚎𝚎𝚖 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚗𝚘 𝚘𝚗𝚎 𝚒𝚜 𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚎𝚍 𝚒𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚜𝚎 𝚒𝚜𝚜𝚞𝚎𝚜, 𝙸 𝚋𝚎𝚕𝚒𝚎𝚟𝚎 𝚒𝚝 𝚒𝚜 𝚘𝚞𝚛 𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚙𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚒𝚋𝚒𝚕𝚒𝚝𝚢 𝚊𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚗𝚔𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚋𝚎𝚐𝚒𝚗𝚜 𝚝𝚘 𝚔𝚎𝚎𝚙 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚜𝚎 𝚍𝚎𝚋𝚊𝚝𝚎𝚜 𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚟𝚎 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚛𝚎𝚕𝚎𝚟𝚊𝚗𝚝.

You are cordially invited to participate. A theme for each day. It is a proposal of the #humanitas Community. In the following links you will find all the necessary information. We are waiting for you… @silher, @chironga67, and @atreyuserver.

INITIATIVE: A theme for everч dαч (November 2024)

CREDITS:

Image: I, II
CoolText

🔆****🔆****🔆****🔆****🔆****🔆****🔆****🔆****🔆****🔆

Dedicɑted to ɑll those poets who contɾibute, dɑγ bγ dɑγ, to mɑke ouɾ plɑnet ɑ betteɾ woɾld.

ℕ𝕚 𝕝𝕒 ℂ𝕚𝕖𝕟𝕔𝕚𝕒, 𝕟𝕚 𝕝𝕒 𝔽𝕚𝕝𝕠𝕤𝕠𝕗𝕚́𝕒…,

𝕖𝕤 𝕝𝕒 𝕧𝕚𝕕𝕒.

𝙲𝚘𝚖𝚘 𝚖𝚊𝚝𝚎𝚖á𝚝𝚒𝚌𝚊 𝚍𝚎 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚏𝚎𝚜𝚒ó𝚗, 𝚕𝚊 𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚐𝚞𝚗𝚝𝚊 𝚜𝚘𝚋𝚛𝚎 𝚌ó𝚖𝚘 𝚜𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚎𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚗 𝚢 𝚍𝚎𝚜𝚊𝚏𝚒𝚊𝚋𝚊𝚗 𝚖𝚞𝚝𝚞𝚊𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝚕𝚊 𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚊 𝚢 𝚕𝚊 𝚏𝚒𝚕𝚘𝚜𝚘𝚏í𝚊 𝚑𝚊 𝚜𝚒𝚍𝚘 𝚞𝚗𝚊 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝚎𝚗 𝚖𝚒𝚜 𝚛𝚎𝚏𝚕𝚎𝚡𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚎𝚜. 𝙰 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚞𝚍𝚘, 𝚖𝚎 𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚞𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚛𝚘 𝚍𝚎𝚋𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚍𝚘 𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚗𝚊𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝚜𝚘𝚋𝚛𝚎 𝚌𝚞á𝚕 𝚎𝚜 𝚖á𝚜 𝚙𝚘𝚍𝚎𝚛𝚘𝚜𝚊: 𝚕𝚊 𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚊 𝚌𝚘𝚗 𝚜𝚞 𝚛𝚒𝚐𝚘𝚛 𝚎𝚖𝚙í𝚛𝚒𝚌𝚘, 𝚕𝚊 𝚛𝚊𝚣ó𝚗 𝚌𝚘𝚗 𝚜𝚞 𝚌𝚕𝚊𝚛𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚍 𝚕ó𝚐𝚒𝚌𝚊, 𝚘 𝚎𝚕 𝚙𝚎𝚗𝚜𝚊𝚖𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚏𝚒𝚕𝚘𝚜ó𝚏𝚒𝚌𝚘, 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚊 𝚟𝚎𝚌𝚎𝚜 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚌𝚒𝚋𝚘 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚘 𝚙𝚊𝚜𝚒𝚟𝚘 𝚢 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚘. 𝚂𝚒𝚗 𝚎𝚖𝚋𝚊𝚛𝚐𝚘, 𝚊 𝚖𝚎𝚍𝚒𝚍𝚊 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚏𝚞𝚗𝚍𝚒𝚣𝚘 𝚎𝚗 𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚘𝚜 𝚝𝚎𝚖𝚊𝚜, 𝚖𝚎 𝚍𝚘𝚢 𝚌𝚞𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚊 𝚍𝚎 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚕𝚊 𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚊 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚘 𝚕𝚊 𝚏𝚒𝚕𝚘𝚜𝚘𝚏í𝚊 𝚝𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚎𝚗 𝚛𝚘𝚕𝚎𝚜 𝚌𝚛𝚞𝚌𝚒𝚊𝚕𝚎𝚜 𝚢 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚎𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚛𝚒𝚘𝚜 𝚎𝚗 𝚕𝚊 𝚋ú𝚜𝚚𝚞𝚎𝚍𝚊 𝚍𝚎𝚕 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚘𝚌𝚒𝚖𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚘.

𝙻𝚊 𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚊, 𝚌𝚘𝚗 𝚜𝚞𝚜 𝚖é𝚝𝚘𝚍𝚘𝚜 𝚎𝚖𝚙í𝚛𝚒𝚌𝚘𝚜 𝚢 𝚎𝚡𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚎𝚜, 𝚋𝚞𝚜𝚌𝚊 𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚍𝚎𝚛 𝚎𝚕 𝚖𝚞𝚗𝚍𝚘 𝚊 𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚟é𝚜 𝚍𝚎 𝚕𝚊 𝚘𝚋𝚜𝚎𝚛𝚟𝚊𝚌𝚒ó𝚗 𝚢 𝚕𝚊 𝚎𝚡𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚌𝚒ó𝚗. 𝙴𝚜 𝚞𝚗𝚊 𝚑𝚎𝚛𝚛𝚊𝚖𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚊 𝚙𝚘𝚍𝚎𝚛𝚘𝚜𝚊 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚍𝚎𝚜𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚛𝚊ñ𝚊𝚛 𝚕𝚘𝚜 𝚖𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚘𝚜 𝚍𝚎 𝚕𝚊 𝚗𝚊𝚝𝚞𝚛𝚊𝚕𝚎𝚣𝚊, 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚖𝚒𝚝𝚒é𝚗𝚍𝚘𝚗𝚘𝚜 𝚑𝚊𝚌𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚎𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚋𝚛𝚒𝚖𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚘𝚜 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚑𝚊𝚗 𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚜𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚖𝚊𝚍𝚘 𝚗𝚞𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚜 𝚟𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚜. 𝙻𝚊 𝚌𝚊𝚙𝚊𝚌𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚍 𝚍𝚎 𝚕𝚊 𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚊 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚐𝚎𝚗𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚛 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚘𝚌𝚒𝚖𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚏𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚋𝚕𝚎 𝚢 𝚛𝚎𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚍𝚞𝚌𝚒𝚋𝚕𝚎 𝚎𝚜 𝚒𝚗𝚒𝚐𝚞𝚊𝚕𝚊𝚋𝚕𝚎. 𝙳𝚎𝚜𝚍𝚎 𝚕𝚊 𝚝𝚎𝚘𝚛í𝚊 𝚍𝚎 𝚕𝚊 𝚛𝚎𝚕𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚍 𝚍𝚎 𝙴𝚒𝚗𝚜𝚝𝚎𝚒𝚗 𝚑𝚊𝚜𝚝𝚊 𝚎𝚕 𝚍𝚎𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚋𝚛𝚒𝚖𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚍𝚎𝚕 𝙰𝙳𝙽, 𝚕𝚊 𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚊 𝚑𝚊 𝚍𝚎𝚖𝚘𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚍𝚘 𝚜𝚎𝚛 𝚞𝚗𝚊 𝚏𝚞𝚎𝚛𝚣𝚊 𝚒𝚖𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊𝚋𝚕𝚎 𝚎𝚗 𝚎𝚕 𝚊𝚟𝚊𝚗𝚌𝚎 𝚍𝚎𝚕 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚘𝚌𝚒𝚖𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚑𝚞𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚘.

𝙿𝚘𝚛 𝚘𝚝𝚛𝚘 𝚕𝚊𝚍𝚘, 𝚕𝚊 𝚏𝚒𝚕𝚘𝚜𝚘𝚏í𝚊 𝚜𝚎 𝚘𝚌𝚞𝚙𝚊 𝚍𝚎 𝚌𝚞𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚎𝚜 𝚖á𝚜 𝚏𝚞𝚗𝚍𝚊𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚎𝚜 𝚢 𝚊𝚋𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚌𝚝𝚊𝚜. 𝙼𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚜 𝚕𝚊 𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚊 𝚗𝚘𝚜 𝚍𝚒𝚌𝚎 𝚌ó𝚖𝚘 𝚏𝚞𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚊 𝚎𝚕 𝚖𝚞𝚗𝚍𝚘, 𝚕𝚊 𝚏𝚒𝚕𝚘𝚜𝚘𝚏í𝚊 𝚗𝚘𝚜 𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚐𝚞𝚗𝚝𝚊 𝚙𝚘𝚛 𝚚𝚞é 𝚎𝚕 𝚖𝚞𝚗𝚍𝚘 𝚎𝚜 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚘 𝚎𝚜 𝚢 𝚌𝚞á𝚕 𝚎𝚜 𝚗𝚞𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚘 𝚕𝚞𝚐𝚊𝚛 𝚎𝚗 é𝚕. 𝙻𝚊 𝚏𝚒𝚕𝚘𝚜𝚘𝚏í𝚊 𝚊𝚋𝚘𝚛𝚍𝚊 𝚝𝚎𝚖𝚊𝚜 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚘 𝚕𝚊 é𝚝𝚒𝚌𝚊, 𝚕𝚊 𝚎𝚡𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚊, 𝚎𝚕 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚘𝚌𝚒𝚖𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚢 𝚕𝚊 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚍, 𝚘𝚏𝚛𝚎𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚍𝚘 𝚞𝚗 𝚖𝚊𝚛𝚌𝚘 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚛𝚎𝚏𝚕𝚎𝚡𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚊𝚛 𝚜𝚘𝚋𝚛𝚎 𝚗𝚞𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚜 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚙𝚒𝚊𝚜 𝚟𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚜 𝚢 𝚎𝚕 𝚖𝚞𝚗𝚍𝚘 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚗𝚘𝚜 𝚛𝚘𝚍𝚎𝚊. 𝙰𝚞𝚗𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚊 𝚟𝚎𝚌𝚎𝚜 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚎𝚌𝚎 𝚙𝚊𝚜𝚒𝚟𝚊, 𝚕𝚊 𝚏𝚒𝚕𝚘𝚜𝚘𝚏í𝚊 𝚎𝚜 𝚎𝚜𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚊𝚕 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚌𝚞𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚊𝚛 𝚕𝚘𝚜 𝚜𝚞𝚙𝚞𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚘𝚜 𝚋á𝚜𝚒𝚌𝚘𝚜 𝚜𝚘𝚋𝚛𝚎 𝚕𝚘𝚜 𝚌𝚞𝚊𝚕𝚎𝚜 𝚜𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚞𝚢𝚎 𝚎𝚕 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚘𝚌𝚒𝚖𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚝í𝚏𝚒𝚌𝚘.

𝙴𝚗 𝚎𝚕 𝚍𝚎𝚋𝚊𝚝𝚎 𝚜𝚘𝚋𝚛𝚎 𝚌𝚞á𝚕 𝚎𝚜 𝚖á𝚜 𝚙𝚘𝚍𝚎𝚛𝚘𝚜𝚊, 𝚕𝚊 𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚊 𝚘 𝚕𝚊 𝚏𝚒𝚕𝚘𝚜𝚘𝚏í𝚊, 𝚕𝚊 𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚙𝚞𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚊 𝚗𝚘 𝚎𝚜 𝚜𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚕𝚕𝚊. 𝙰𝚖𝚋𝚊𝚜 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚒𝚙𝚕𝚒𝚗𝚊𝚜 𝚝𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚎𝚗 𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚎𝚣𝚊𝚜 𝚢 𝚍𝚎𝚋𝚒𝚕𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚜. 𝙻𝚊 𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚊 𝚎𝚜 𝚒𝚗𝚍𝚞𝚍𝚊𝚋𝚕𝚎𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝚙𝚘𝚍𝚎𝚛𝚘𝚜𝚊 𝚎𝚗 𝚝é𝚛𝚖𝚒𝚗𝚘𝚜 𝚍𝚎 𝚜𝚞 𝚌𝚊𝚙𝚊𝚌𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚍 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚍𝚞𝚌𝚒𝚛 𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚞𝚕𝚝𝚊𝚍𝚘𝚜 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚌𝚛𝚎𝚝𝚘𝚜 𝚢 𝚙𝚛á𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚌𝚘𝚜. 𝚂𝚒𝚗 𝚎𝚖𝚋𝚊𝚛𝚐𝚘, 𝚜𝚒𝚗 𝚕𝚊 𝚐𝚞í𝚊 𝚍𝚎 𝚕𝚊 𝚏𝚒𝚕𝚘𝚜𝚘𝚏í𝚊, 𝚕𝚊 𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚊 𝚙𝚘𝚍𝚛í𝚊 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚍𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚎 𝚎𝚗 𝚞𝚗 𝚖𝚊𝚛 𝚍𝚎 𝚍𝚊𝚝𝚘𝚜 𝚜𝚒𝚗 𝚜𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚒𝚍𝚘. 𝙻𝚊 𝚏𝚒𝚕𝚘𝚜𝚘𝚏í𝚊, 𝚊𝚞𝚗𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚊 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚞𝚍𝚘 𝚖á𝚜 𝚊𝚋𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚌𝚝𝚊, 𝚗𝚘𝚜 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚙𝚘𝚛𝚌𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚊 𝚎𝚕 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚡𝚝𝚘 𝚢 𝚕𝚊 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚗𝚜𝚒ó𝚗 𝚗𝚎𝚌𝚎𝚜𝚊𝚛𝚒𝚊 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚝𝚊𝚛 𝚕𝚘𝚜 𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚞𝚕𝚝𝚊𝚍𝚘𝚜 𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚝í𝚏𝚒𝚌𝚘𝚜 𝚢 𝚊𝚙𝚕𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚛𝚕𝚘𝚜 𝚍𝚎 𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚎𝚛𝚊 𝚜𝚒𝚐𝚗𝚒𝚏𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚊 𝚎𝚗 𝚗𝚞𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚜 𝚟𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚜.

𝙴𝚗 𝚖𝚒𝚜 𝚎𝚡𝚙𝚕𝚘𝚛𝚊𝚌𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚎𝚜, 𝚝𝚊𝚖𝚋𝚒é𝚗 𝚗𝚘𝚝ó 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚊 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚞𝚍𝚘 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚎𝚌𝚎 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚊 𝚗𝚊𝚍𝚒𝚎 𝚕𝚎 𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚊𝚗 𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚘𝚜 𝚝𝚎𝚖𝚊𝚜. 𝙴𝚗 𝚎𝚕 𝚝𝚘𝚛𝚋𝚎𝚕𝚕𝚒𝚗𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚕𝚊 𝚟𝚒𝚍𝚊 𝚖𝚘𝚍𝚎𝚛𝚗𝚊, 𝚕𝚊 𝚐𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝚝𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚍𝚎 𝚊 𝚎𝚗𝚏𝚘𝚌𝚊𝚛𝚜𝚎 𝚎𝚗 𝚕𝚘 𝚒𝚗𝚖𝚎𝚍𝚒𝚊𝚝𝚘 𝚢 𝚙𝚛á𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚌𝚘, 𝚍𝚎𝚓𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚕𝚊𝚍𝚘 𝚕𝚊𝚜 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚏𝚞𝚗𝚍𝚊𝚜 𝚛𝚎𝚏𝚕𝚎𝚡𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚎𝚜 𝚏𝚒𝚕𝚘𝚜ó𝚏𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚜 𝚢 𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚝í𝚏𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚜. 𝚂𝚒𝚗 𝚎𝚖𝚋𝚊𝚛𝚐𝚘, 𝚌𝚛𝚎𝚘 𝚏𝚒𝚛𝚖𝚎𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚘𝚜 𝚍𝚎𝚋𝚊𝚝𝚎𝚜 𝚜𝚘𝚗 𝚏𝚞𝚗𝚍𝚊𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚎𝚜 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚎𝚕 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚐𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚕𝚊 𝚑𝚞𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚍. 𝙻𝚊 𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚊 𝚜𝚒𝚗 𝚏𝚒𝚕𝚘𝚜𝚘𝚏í𝚊 𝚙𝚞𝚎𝚍𝚎 𝚟𝚘𝚕𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚎 𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚐𝚊 𝚢 𝚜𝚒𝚗 𝚍𝚒𝚛𝚎𝚌𝚌𝚒ó𝚗, 𝚖𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚜 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚕𝚊 𝚏𝚒𝚕𝚘𝚜𝚘𝚏í𝚊 𝚜𝚒𝚗 𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚊 𝚙𝚞𝚎𝚍𝚎 𝚟𝚘𝚕𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚎 𝚎𝚜𝚝é𝚛𝚒𝚕 𝚢 𝚍𝚎𝚜𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚎𝚌𝚝𝚊𝚍𝚊 𝚍𝚎 𝚕𝚊 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚍.

𝙿𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚒𝚕𝚞𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚛 𝚌ó𝚖𝚘 𝚜𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚎𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚗 𝚢 𝚍𝚎𝚜𝚊𝚏𝚒𝚊𝚋𝚊𝚗 𝚖𝚞𝚝𝚞𝚊𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝚕𝚊 𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚊 𝚢 𝚕𝚊 𝚏𝚒𝚕𝚘𝚜𝚘𝚏í𝚊, 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚒𝚍𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚖𝚘𝚜 𝚎𝚕 𝚌𝚊𝚖𝚙𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚕𝚊 𝚋𝚒𝚘é𝚝𝚒𝚌𝚊. 𝙻𝚊𝚜 𝚒𝚗𝚗𝚘𝚟𝚊𝚌𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚎𝚜 𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚝í𝚏𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚜 𝚎𝚗 𝚕𝚊 𝚖𝚎𝚍𝚒𝚌𝚒𝚗𝚊 𝚢 𝚕𝚊 𝚋𝚒𝚘𝚝𝚎𝚌𝚗𝚘𝚕𝚘𝚐í𝚊, 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚘 𝚕𝚊 𝚎𝚍𝚒𝚌𝚒ó𝚗 𝚐𝚎𝚗é𝚝𝚒𝚌𝚊 𝚢 𝚕𝚊 𝚌𝚕𝚘𝚗𝚊𝚌𝚒ó𝚗, 𝚙𝚕𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚊𝚗 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚏𝚞𝚗𝚍𝚊𝚜 𝚌𝚞𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚎𝚜 é𝚝𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚜 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚕𝚊 𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚊 𝚙𝚘𝚛 𝚜í 𝚜𝚘𝚕𝚊 𝚗𝚘 𝚙𝚞𝚎𝚍𝚎 𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚙𝚘𝚗𝚍𝚎𝚛. 𝙰𝚚𝚞í 𝚎𝚜 𝚍𝚘𝚗𝚍𝚎 𝚕𝚊 𝚏𝚒𝚕𝚘𝚜𝚘𝚏í𝚊 𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚛𝚊 𝚎𝚗 𝚓𝚞𝚎𝚐𝚘, 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚙𝚘𝚛𝚌𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚘 𝚞𝚗 𝚖𝚊𝚛𝚌𝚘 é𝚝𝚒𝚌𝚘 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚎𝚟𝚊𝚕𝚞𝚊𝚛 𝚕𝚘𝚜 𝚒𝚖𝚙𝚊𝚌𝚝𝚘𝚜 𝚍𝚎 𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚘𝚜 𝚊𝚟𝚊𝚗𝚌𝚎𝚜 𝚢 𝚐𝚞𝚒𝚊𝚛 𝚗𝚞𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚜 𝚍𝚎𝚌𝚒𝚜𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚎𝚜.

𝚈𝚊 𝚎𝚜 𝚑𝚘𝚛𝚊 𝚍𝚎 𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚜 𝚙𝚊𝚕𝚊𝚋𝚛𝚊𝚜, 𝚟𝚊𝚌í𝚊 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚖𝚞𝚌𝚑𝚘𝚜; 𝚎𝚗 𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚞𝚖𝚎𝚗: 𝚕𝚊 𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚊 𝚢 𝚕𝚊 𝚏𝚒𝚕𝚘𝚜𝚘𝚏í𝚊 𝚜𝚘𝚗 𝚍𝚘𝚜 𝚌𝚊𝚛𝚊𝚜 𝚍𝚎 𝚕𝚊 𝚖𝚒𝚜𝚖𝚊 𝚖𝚘𝚗𝚎𝚍𝚊 𝚎𝚗 𝚕𝚊 𝚋ú𝚜𝚚𝚞𝚎𝚍𝚊 𝚍𝚎𝚕 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚘𝚌𝚒𝚖𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚘. 𝚂𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚎𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚗 𝚊𝚕 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚙𝚘𝚛𝚌𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚊𝚛 𝚖é𝚝𝚘𝚍𝚘𝚜 𝚢 𝚖𝚊𝚛𝚌𝚘𝚜 𝚍𝚒𝚏𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚜 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚘 𝚒𝚐𝚞𝚊𝚕𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝚒𝚖𝚙𝚘𝚛𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚜 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚍𝚎𝚛 𝚎𝚕 𝚖𝚞𝚗𝚍𝚘. 𝙼𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚜 𝚕𝚊 𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚊 𝚗𝚘𝚜 𝚍𝚊 𝚕𝚊𝚜 𝚑𝚎𝚛𝚛𝚊𝚖𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚜 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚎𝚡𝚙𝚕𝚘𝚛𝚊𝚛 𝚢 𝚍𝚎𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚋𝚛𝚒𝚛, 𝚕𝚊 𝚏𝚒𝚕𝚘𝚜𝚘𝚏í𝚊 𝚗𝚘𝚜 𝚍𝚊 𝚎𝚕 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚙ó𝚜𝚒𝚝𝚘 𝚢 𝚎𝚕 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚡𝚝𝚘 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚎𝚜𝚊𝚜 𝚎𝚡𝚙𝚕𝚘𝚛𝚊𝚌𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚎𝚜. 𝙰𝚖𝚋𝚘𝚜 𝚌𝚊𝚖𝚙𝚘𝚜, 𝚊𝚞𝚗𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚊 𝚟𝚎𝚌𝚎𝚜 𝚎𝚗 𝚍𝚎𝚜𝚊𝚌𝚞𝚎𝚛𝚍𝚘, 𝚜𝚎 𝚗𝚎𝚌𝚎𝚜𝚒𝚝𝚊𝚗 𝚖𝚞𝚝𝚞𝚊𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚞𝚒𝚛 𝚞𝚗 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚘𝚌𝚒𝚖𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚎𝚝𝚘 𝚢 𝚜𝚒𝚐𝚗𝚒𝚏𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚘. 𝚈 𝚊𝚞𝚗𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚎𝚣𝚌𝚊 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚊 𝚗𝚊𝚍𝚒𝚎 𝚕𝚎 𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚊𝚗 𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚘𝚜 𝚝𝚎𝚖𝚊𝚜, 𝚌𝚛𝚎𝚘 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚎𝚜 𝚗𝚞𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚊 𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚙𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚊𝚋𝚒𝚕𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚍 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚘 𝚜𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚜 𝚙𝚎𝚗𝚜𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚜 𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚎𝚛 𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚘𝚜 𝚍𝚎𝚋𝚊𝚝𝚎𝚜 𝚟𝚒𝚟𝚘𝚜 𝚢 𝚛𝚎𝚕𝚎𝚟𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚜.

Estás cordialmente invitado a participar. Un tema para cada día. Es una propuesta de la Comunidad #humanitas. En el siguiente enlaces encontrarás toda la información necesaria. Te esperamos… @cirangela, @felpach, y @lauril.

INICIATIVA: Un temα pαrα cαdα dı́α (Noviembre 2024)

CRÉDITOS:

Imágenes: I, II
Títulos: CoolText

🔆****🔆****🔆****🔆****🔆****🔆****🔆****🔆****🔆****🔆

Dedicɑdo ɑ todos ɑquellos que contɾibuγen, díɑ ɑ díɑ, ɑ hɑceɾ de nuestɾo plɑnetɑ, un mundo mejoɾ.

spanish humanitas soloescribe neoxian wrtiting fun pob iniciativa ecency literatos

0.000

1 comments

@hivebuzz 74

24 days ago

Congratulations @amigoponc! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain And have been rewarded with New badge(s)

	You have been a buzzy bee and published a post every day of the week.

_{You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking}
_{If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP}