Why Isn't Web3 Social Media Growing At a Faster Rate?

While traveling to Pennsylvania from Texas this week, I've had a little chance to reflect on the Web3 social media ecosystem and its progress toward that promised paradise of easy monetization, secure intellectual property rights for creators, unparalleled decentralization, and digital identity control for every man and woman. Have we arrived? Are we almost there?

Much to my chagrin, I'll have to say we're not quite there. Not even close. But why?

It seems there are three things going on in the Web3 social media development space that is preventing us from reaching paradise.

  1. Too many platforms, not enough players - At my last count, there were more than 100 different Web3 social media platform trying to become the Facebook of the Web3 space. I list them in the appendix of my book Web3 Social: How Creators Are Changing the World Wide Web (And You Can Too!). There are probably close to 200 now, because they just keep popping up. Until Web3 social media platforms can attract more users, which isn't happening despite all the talk, this isn't likely to change.
  2. Development is slow - Most of these projects are underfunded and developers are overworked. That means new features are slow in the coming. Hive is about four years old now and it still looks like it did when it launched, which is almost a carbon copy of its predecessor Steemit, which launched in 2006. Platforms that do roll out features more quickly are still not getting a lot of traction among new users. DeSo and Lens, both of which launched with much fanfare, have turned out to be major disappointments for many users and the user base has declined considerably.
  3. Adoption isn't happening - That brings me to my third point. People just aren't adopting this new technology. For the most part, the people using Web3 social media today are still the same people who used it seven or eight years ago, with some recidivism. There are many more platforms now than then and the user base from Steemit has moved on to other platforms. The audience has been splintered. The intended audience, current Web2 social media users, are content with Facebook, TikTok, X, and the pantheon of legacy platforms. Heck, even Web3 social media enthusiasts have realized that they too must play on the legacy platforms in order to have conversations with everyone else for the purpose of recruitment. Non-adopters site several reasons for their reluctance to switch over to Web3 social media platforms: 1) not interested in cryptocurrencies; 2) the onramp is too complex and difficult to navigate; 3) they don't want to lose the audience they've built up over the years on legacy social media platforms. All of these are legitimate reasons for lack of interest. Is there a way to get over these hurdles?

I wish I knew the solution. For the most part, no platform has gained the popularity necessary to turn heads. Steemit was on track at one time before internal pressures drove its founders away to other projects and selling the platform to Justin Sun. That led to a fork and the creation of Hive, which, if you're a regular reader, know is my favorite Web3 social media platform.

While Hive has its benefits, there are some drawbacks. The most decentralized among the platforms that claim to be decentralized, it has failed to attract new users at a rate that would cause it attract earned media.

Here's what I think a Web3 social media platform needs in order to attract new users and prove to the world that it can compete against Facebook and X:

  • True decentralization - While Hive is close, there is an appearance of whale dominated culture. Whether it's real or not, a perception has a way of becoming reality even against all opposition. The next great Web3 social media platform must find a way to be truly decentralized.
  • Strong marketing - It is very difficult to achieve any level of success at marketing without some level of centralization, but that is what is needed. If Web3 social media communities can figure out how to be aggressive with marketing a platform, including the deployment of a strong branding message, while remaining decentralized, there's a fighting chance at achieving the golden dream.
  • Offer something besides native crypto - If people are not interested in your core offering, you'll fight an uphill battle your whole life through. The great majority of people are not interested in crypto, let alone your native token. They just don't see the benefit and don't want to learn. Even those who are interested, or willing to give it a try, want something more than your little coin. Web3 social media platforms need to offer a bridge very early on to USDC and USDT, the two leading stablecoins. Being able to trade your native token, if you have one, quickly and easily with Bitcoin and fiat money, especially fiat money, would also go a long way to encouraging users to try your platform. But once you get them there, you must find a way to keep them there.
  • Make your platform attractive - I've seen some attractive Web3 social media platforms, but they often have other issues that prevent adoption. Several platforms have realized the user adoption conundrum and opted to focus on being a crypto-focused platform. In other words, they're content with being a social media platform for crypto enthusiasts. That's fine if that's what they want, but the audience will always be limited. An attractive platform that is easy to use will go a long way to attracting an audience, but this must be done with sacrificing decentralization.
  • Build in public and offer cool features - People want their social media to be social. That means there must be cool social media platforms. Hive is great, for bloggers. Its video components are great for video creators, but most of these creators are heading to YouTube still. It's time for Web3 social media platforms to distinguish themselves in a way to legacy social media audiences want (in other words, beyond crypto).

Web3 social media may never attract a mass audience, and by mass audience I mean the average Facebook and TikTok user. I'm okay with that. I think it's perfectly acceptable to remain a niche product, but new Web3 social media platforms must define what they are and who their audience is early on. Make it easy for users to show up, sign up, earn for their creations, stake their earnings, and cash out when they're ready to leave. If you do everything else right, they may never want to leave.

Connect With Me

Feel free to connect with me on the following Web3 social media platforms.

This post was first published by Author Allen Taylor at Paragraph. Image from Pexels.

Posted Using InLeo Alpha



0
0
0.000
6 comments
avatar
(Edited)

database + frontends is just such a good combination. it will trump any centralized structure because it grants choice and preference.

all hive really needs then is an attractive front end for maximum accessibility, if there is such a thing

i'm happy to say ecency, keychain and peakd are the best they ever were. i noticed after being away for two years.

and despite all its potential... it's still awfully quiet around here

0
0
0.000
avatar

In terms of aesthetics, Ecency and Peakd are well ahead of the rest of the pack. That's for sure. Keychain is attractive and easy to use. I think Hive suffers from two things:

  1. Lack of a real marketing arm that can get the word out about the blockchain and its associated benefits;
  2. And, among those already familiar with it, a bad reputation for benefiting whales more than everyone else.

We can chirp all we want about how No. 2 isn't true, but that's a perception that isn't likely to go away. Plus, there are some folks who just don't like Hive for whatever reason.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Great post - I've been thinking about this quite a bit recently. My conclusions boil down to two factors;

  1. It has to be user-friendly for non-technical people (anything crypto seems to be over-complex for it's own sake).
  2. It has to do something awesome to hook in ordinary users that Web2 social platforms don't or can't offer. Web3 can't be "just another Facebook" or "just another Twitter", Web2 already does those better than Web3 ever could.
0
0
0.000
avatar

Yes, that's what it boils down to. Non-techies look at it and think it's over their heads. Web3 true believers tend to focus mostly on the crypto aspect of the technology, but there are other benefits. If Web3 doesn't solve a problem that other social media platforms don't solve AND that solution can't be communicated effectively to the people who need that problem solved, I'm afraid it won't ever grow beyond the "curiosity" stage.

0
0
0.000
avatar

One method that might be untapped is that Hive is actually a package deal when an account is created. Participants on Hive are given so many options that cross over with Web2/normal platforms(Social, Shops, Streaming,) that it's basically a linktree-esque service. Cryptocurrency probably shouldn't be the main reason to attract participants as they tend to only focus on the value of the coin as opposed to the utility of the space.

Ownership is quickly resurfacing as a main attraction point for many who are starting to become aware of how much control the platforms have over what the user creates. If Hive is true on how it defines "Ownership', That could possibly bring in more participants that care about the space and support the projects in it more than the value of the coin.

It's not just about bringing in more participants, but bringing in participants of quality that will grow the space instead of abusing it and leaving it in a worse position.

4 years is relatively young in this space and the fact it is still around shows that there are people who care about the Web3 space.

You are doing the right thing in sharing your thoughts about the population, it is an issue that needs to be taken more seriously by the community. Guides, onboarding processes, examples, both digital and physical meetups and much more need to be created and put into action by every participant to help solve this issue.

Thank you for creating this post! It's tough to navigate around the 'Cryptocurrency' aspect that many are focused on when there are many other beneficial reasons to participate on Hive and Web3.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I wish I could upvote this twice. Great points!

I totally agree that account ownership a huge benefit that should be discussed more often. It is way more important than the value of the cryptocurrency. Of course, I've been as guilty as anyone about stressing the value of the crypto, since I publish a Web3 social media earnings report every month. But without account ownership, it wouldn't matter how much one earns. Account ownership is what allows users to claim that crypto and keep it safe.

Another good point you make is about the quality of participants. As long as crypto and its underlying value is what community members stress, the people attracted to Hive will be those bent of sucking the value out of it and leaving it dry. Spammers and scammers. Those are the people we want less of. We want people who will come with a mindset that says, "What can I contribute to make this a better community?" Ask not what your social media platform can do for you; rather, ask what you can do for your social media platform.

You're right that four years is still young. Dan Larimer's dream, however, is older than that. It's been eight years since Steemit launched. That means Hive has been around for as long as Steemit had when it forked. If it can survive for five years, it should have long-term staying power. I can hardly wait to see what it looks like ten years from now.

Thanks for the comment and words of encouragement. If we can somehow position Hive as a place for developers, we might begin to see more measurable value added than extracted.

0
0
0.000